Case 3313468/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person by video link. For the v Mr A Sutherland (Solicitor) — 2020
- Case reference
- 3313468/2019
- Decision date
- 20 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Palmer Date
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person by video link. For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Cambridge on 14 January 2020 before Employment Judge K J Palmer. The claimant, Mr Y Sivakumaran, appeared in person by video link, and the respondent, Experis Ltd, was represented by Mr A Sutherland, solicitor.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant's claims for unlawful deduction of wages and holiday pay failed and were dismissed. No separate remedy was awarded in the written record.
The judgment note states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. The extracted written decision therefore records only the dismissal outcome, not any detailed findings or legal analysis.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.