Case 3313469/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Broadland Guarding Services Ltd and Mil-Ken Travel Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 3313469/2023
- Decision date
- 21 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Graham Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal decided a preliminary issue concerning whether there was a relevant transfer. It found that there was a relevant transfer by service provision change under Regulation 3(1)(b)(ii) of the Transfer of Undertakings Protection of Employment Regulations 2006.
The Tribunal found that the date of the relevant transfer was 1 August 2023. It also found that all of the claimants were assigned to the transferring activity.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The judgment is on a preliminary issue only and decides that there was a relevant transfer under TUPE; it does not determine the other listed claim categories or any remedy. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Regulation 3(1)(b)(ii) of the Transfer of Undertakings Protection of Employment Regulations 2006
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.