Case 3313489/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R North v David Einig Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3313489/2019
- Decision date
- 11 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vowles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R North
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a response, so the tribunal entered judgment for the claimant under Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The tribunal held that the complaint that the respondent failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, brought under section 189(1)(d), was well founded.
For that protective award claim, the tribunal fixed the protected period at 90 days beginning on 28 March 2018 and assessed the award at £9,642.86, calculated as £750 multiplied by 90 days, expressed in the judgment as 126/7 weeks. The tribunal also upheld the wages claim, finding that the claimant was owed wages and awarding £1,000 in compensation.
The total award was £10,642.86, and the respondent was ordered to pay that sum to the claimant. The hearing listed for 21 February 2020 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award under section 189(1)(d) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for failure to comply with section 188. The protected period was 90 days beginning with 28 March 2018. | Upheld | — | £9,643 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the claimant was owed wages and awarded £1,000 in compensation. | Upheld | — | £1,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,643
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- s.188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- s.189(1)(d) Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.