Case 3313502/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D R Ferrari v E&O Moonlight Catering Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3313502/2020
- Decision date
- 1 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D R Ferrari
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Tobin Date entered judgment under Rule 21 on 9 November 2021, with the judgment sent to the parties and entered in the register on 1 December 2021. The tribunal ordered the respondent, E&O Moonlight Catering Ltd, to pay the claimant, Miss D R Ferrari, £3,047.92 for unauthorised deductions from wages, £644.00 in damages for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice, and £2,392.00 for unpaid holiday entitlement.
The extracted judgment contains only these orders and does not set out further reasoning or separate liability analysis. The total sum ordered is £6,083.92.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and orders payment of the net sum of £3,047.92. | Upheld | — | £3,048 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awards damages of £644.00. The wording used in the judgment is breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £644 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and orders payment of £2,392.00. | Upheld | — | £2,392 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,084
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.