Case 3313532/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Carmo v Wireless Excellence Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3313532/2019
- Decision date
- 12 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Carmo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered judgment under Rule 21. It found that Wireless Excellence Limited had made unlawful deductions from Mr N Carmo's wages in the gross sum of £1,833.33. That claim was therefore upheld, with the award tied to the wage deduction finding.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay Mr Carmo for his notice period, which it treated as a breach of contract. It awarded £1,420.00 in damages for that failure. The hearing listed for 12 December 2019 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found the respondent had made unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages in the gross sum of £1,833.33. | Upheld | — | £1,833 |
| Breach of contract | Tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant for his notice period and awarded £1,420.00 by way of damages. | Upheld | — | £1,420 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,253
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,420
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.