Case 3313533/2023 · Employment Tribunal
No attendance, no v Mr T Wainwright, director — 2024
- Case reference
- 3313533/2023
- Decision date
- 9 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
No attendance, no
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant did not attend the final hearing and applied for a postponement on the morning of the hearing. The tribunal refused the application because it was not persuaded that exceptional circumstances had been shown, and proceeded in the claimant's absence under the tribunal rules.
The proceedings concerned unpaid commission arising from the claimant's employment as a recruitment consultant. The tribunal found that the contract allowed post-termination commission to be assessed at the director's discretion, and that the relevant discretion had to be exercised reasonably and not capriciously.
The tribunal preferred Mr Wainwright's evidence on the work done for the placement and was satisfied that he assessed the commission in line with his usual practice. The respondent accepted that £162.50 was due, and the tribunal awarded that sum to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim concerned unpaid commission after the claimant's employment ended. The tribunal awarded the amount the respondent accepted was due. | Upheld | — | £163 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £163
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.