Case 3313553/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Jimson-Elliott v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 3313553/2022
- Decision date
- 3 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JUDGMENT
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mrs L Jimson-Elliott
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued on the basis that the respondent had not presented a valid response in time. On the information before the Employment Judge, the claimant succeeded on all three money claims brought against Purfleet Brasserie Limited.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the net sum of £930. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £465.
In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had breached contract by failing to pay an agreed starting bonus of £1,000. The judgment stated that the total payable under the judgment, without deduction and taxable in the claimant's hands, was £2,395.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £930 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment describes this as the claimant being dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £465 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment says the respondent failed to pay an agreed "starting bonus". | Upheld | — | £1,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,395
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.