Case 3313556/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Stuart and Mr R Stuart v Mr A Dellar — 2023
- Case reference
- 3313556/2022
- Decision date
- 11 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dobbie
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Stuart and Mr R Stuart
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a paper judgment under rule 60, heard at Cambridge by Employment Judge Dobbie on 23 February 2023. The written record covers case numbers 3313556/2022 and 3313557/2022 and states that the respondent confirmed he did not defend the claims.
The tribunal therefore upheld the claimants' claims for unfair dismissal. The judgment does not set out any contested findings of fact or legal analysis because the respondent did not defend the claims and no oral hearing was held.
No remedy figures are recorded in the written decision, and the note at the end states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. On the face of the judgment, the only recorded outcome is that the unfair dismissal claims were upheld.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the respondent confirmed he did not defend the claims, and that the claimants' claims for unfair dismissal were upheld. No monetary award is stated in the written record. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.