Case 3313559/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Robinson v South Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 3313559/2023
- Decision date
- 28 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George
- Venue
- Reading
- Panel members
- Mr A Kapur, Ms C Tufts
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Robinson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Reading, sitting before Employment Judge George with Mr A Kapur and Ms C Tufts, heard the case on 20 to 22, 26 and 28 August 2025. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the document itself records only the outcomes of the complaints.
The complaint of automatic unfair dismissal on grounds of protected disclosure was dismissed. The separate complaint of unfair dismissal was also dismissed, as was the complaint of disability discrimination. The judgment states in each instance that the complaint was not well founded.
No monetary award is recorded in the written judgment, and no separate remedy figures are provided for any of the complaints.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment records this as a complaint of automatic unfair dismissal on grounds of protected disclosure. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.