Case 3313562/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Vickerstaff v Downham and Clackclose Conservative Club — 2023
- Case reference
- 3313562/2022
- Decision date
- 14 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Vickerstaff
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letters sent by email on 6 June 2023 and 13 June 2023, the Tribunal gave Miss K Vickerstaff an opportunity to make representations by 4 pm on 13 June 2023, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out for failure to comply with the Tribunal's order dated 14 April 2023. The judgment records that the claimant did not make written representations and did not ask for a hearing.
The Tribunal also noted that the claimant did not respond to the Respondent's strike out application or to the request for clarification about whether she intended to attend the hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 14 June 2023 did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive heads of claim; it states only that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37 for failure to comply with the Tribunal's order dated 14 April 2023. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.