Case 3313568/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Rowlands v Bambi Pub Company Ltd (09480712) — 2019
- Case reference
- 3313568/2019
- Decision date
- 3 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jenkins
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Rowlands
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment for Mr D Rowlands against Bambi Pub Company Ltd. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £84.00 gross.
It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and awarded £442.00 gross in damages. A further finding was made that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement, with an award of £148.00 gross. The hearing listed for 3 September 2019 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £84.00 for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £84 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded gross damages of £442.00. | Upheld | — | £442 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered £148.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £148 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £674
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.