Case 3313568/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person (with an interpreter: Turkish) For the v Mr Harun Ozer (a friend) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3313568/2022
- Decision date
- 13 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person (with an interpreter: Turkish) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal first dealt with the late presentation point. It found that the claim was notified to Acas on 12 November 2022 and presented on 15 November 2022, after the primary limitation period had expired, but accepted the claimant's evidence that he had been in Turkey for two months, was then involved in criminal proceedings arising from the incident on 4 July 2022, and only learned from the Magistrates' sentencing remarks that he could pursue unpaid wages through a claim. As a Turkish speaker who said he did not know how to bring an employment tribunal claim, the tribunal found that his ignorance of his rights was reasonable and that he acted promptly once he became aware of them, so the claim was in time.
On the merits, the respondent filed no witness statement or documents. The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that he started work on 21 June 2022, that he was to be paid £700 per six-day week, and that he worked 13 days until 3 July 2022. On that basis it calculated gross pay at £1,516.66.
The tribunal rejected the respondent's case that £600 had already been paid. It found there was no evidence of payment, and it accepted the claimant's evidence that his later conduct, including the criminal damage incident on 4 July 2022, was consistent with frustration about unpaid wages rather than revenge for dismissal. Judgment was therefore entered that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and was in breach of contract, and the respondent was ordered to pay £1,516.66 subject to tax and national insurance.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages. The award was not split between this finding and the breach of contract finding. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal also held that the respondent was in breach of contract. The tribunal made one lump sum award of £1,516.66 rather than apportioning it between claims. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,517
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.