Case 3313592/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. Ryan Clarke v Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 3313592/2022
- Decision date
- 3 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Daley Employment
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Employment Member Jaffe, Employment Member Sagar
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. Ryan Clarke
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment with no hearing at Watford Employment Tribunal on 3 October 2024 before Employment Judge Daley, Employment Member Jaffe and Employment Member Sagar. The claimant, Mr Ryan Clarke, did not attend and was unrepresented. The respondent, Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, was represented by Mr Gareth Price.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's disability discrimination claim in accordance with Rule 47 of the ETs (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the ground that he did not attend the hearing. No substantive findings on the merits of the discrimination allegation are recorded in the judgment, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed under Rule 47 of the ETs (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 because the claimant did not attend the hearing and was unrepresented. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.