Case 3313635/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Jeffery v Premiere Conferencing UK Limited (in compulsory liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3313635/2022
- Decision date
- 4 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shasri
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Jeffery
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Mr S Jeffery's claim against Premiere Conferencing UK Limited (in compulsory liquidation). It found that the respondent was in compulsory liquidation and that permission of the court had not been obtained for the proceedings to continue, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986. On that basis, the claim could not proceed.
The Tribunal also noted that, on 4 December 2023, it had given the claimant 14 days to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying claim type. It was struck out because the respondent company was in compulsory liquidation and permission of the court had not been obtained to continue the proceedings under the Insolvency Act 1986. The Tribunal also recorded that the claimant failed to give an acceptable reason after being given 14 days on 4 December 2023 to explain why the claim should not be struck out for lack of active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Insolvency Act 1986
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.