Case 3313687/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Bilbao v CILEx Law School Limited and the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives and others. — 2021
- Case reference
- 3313687/2020
- Decision date
- 6 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharkett REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Bilbao
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Cambridge hearing on 20 July 2021, before Employment Judge Sharkett, Ms C Bilbao appeared in person and the respondents were represented by Mr Pryke, solicitor. The tribunal recorded that the claimant's claim of unlawful discrimination on the protected characteristic of disability was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.
The tribunal also recorded that the claimant's claim under s27 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. In addition, the claimant withdrew her claims under the Health and Safety Legislation.
No liability findings beyond those disposals were made in the written record, and no monetary remedy was awarded. The note at the end of the judgment states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the claimant's disability discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment records that the claimant's claim under s27 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The claimant withdrew her claims under the Health and Safety Legislation. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.