Case 3313689/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Carr, Daughter For the v Mr S Harte, Solicitor — 2022
- Case reference
- 3313689/2020
- Decision date
- 21 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Carr, Daughter For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Watford on 8 June 2022, Employment Judge George heard the case of Mr N Carr v Royal Mail Group Ltd. The written judgment records that the claims were not presented within the applicable time limit and that it was reasonably practicable to do so.
On that basis, the tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to hear the claims. All claims were dismissed without any merits finding on the underlying allegations. The written record also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons would follow unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not list this claim separately, but the gov.uk listing identifies unfair dismissal as one of the case categories. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not list this claim separately, but the gov.uk listing identifies unlawful deduction from wages as one of the case categories. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not list this claim separately, but the gov.uk listing identifies a Working Time Regulations claim as one of the case categories. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.