Case 3313715/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Singh v Kwiiikk Transport Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3313715/2022
- Decision date
- 11 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Singh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 21 May 2024 to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, explaining why the claim should not be struck out, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment strikes out the claim generally and does not distinguish the listed causes of action; this claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment strikes out the claim generally and does not distinguish the listed causes of action; this claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment strikes out the claim generally and does not distinguish the listed causes of action; this claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment strikes out the claim generally and does not distinguish the listed causes of action; this claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing context. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.