Case 3313731/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 3313731/2022
- Decision date
- 15 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrew Clarke
- Venue
- Cambridge
- Panel members
- Ms Wendy Smith, Mr David Snashall
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat in Cambridge on 13, 14 and 15 November 2023 before Employment Judge Andrew Clarke KC, with Ms Wendy Smith and Mr David Snashall as members. The claimant appeared in person and the respondents were represented by Ms Katharine Bailey, Counsel.
The written judgment states that the claimant was not directly discriminated against by either respondent by reason of his nationality, or otherwise. On that basis, the tribunal dismissed all claims against the respondents.
This short formal record does not set out separate factual findings or legal reasoning for each pleaded claim. It records only the final disposal and does not identify any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment expressly states that the claimant was not directly discriminated against by either respondent by reason of his nationality (or otherwise), and that all claims were dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The written record does not separately set out the unfair dismissal reasoning, but it records that all claims against the respondents were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.