Case 3313734/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In Person by telephone v Neets Plug Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3313734/2019
- Decision date
- 10 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person by telephone
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 10 June 2020, Employment Judge Smail heard Mrs A Edgar's claims against Neets Plug Limited at Watford. The respondent did not appear. The tribunal found that the claimant's claims for unauthorised deductions from earnings and holiday pay were well-founded.
The tribunal ordered payment of unpaid salary for November 2018 (£645.37 net) and December 2018 (£1,003.84 net), holiday pay accrued but unpaid at termination of employment (£450 gross), unpaid employer pension contributions (£106.34), and consequential loss to Universal Credit arising from the incorrect representation that the December 2018 salary had been paid (£371, representing one month's benefits payment). The total ordered was £2,576.55.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim for unauthorised deductions from earnings well-founded. The award schedule covered unpaid salary for November 2018, unpaid salary for December 2018, unpaid employer pension contributions, and consequential loss to Universal Credit caused by the incorrect representation that the December 2018 salary had been paid. | Upheld | — | £2,127 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the holiday pay claim well-founded and awarded holiday pay accrued but unpaid at termination of employment, shown separately in the schedule of award. | Upheld | — | £450 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,577
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.