M Sivarajah v Harvest Energy Limited — 2024

Case reference: 3313741/2022
Decision date: 10 June 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Hutchings Date

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

M Sivarajah

Respondent

Harvest Energy Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

By a letter dated 26 April 2024, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that the claimant had not complied with the tribunal’s order dated 7 November 2023 and that the case had not been actively pursued.

The tribunal considered the claimant’s email of 13 May 2024, which requested an extension of time for 15 May 2024. The reasons state that the requested date had passed, that no further correspondence had been received, and that the email did not make sufficient representations against strike out or request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim.

The judgment also records that the hearing listed for 14 to 21 February 2025 will not take place. No compensation or other monetary remedy was awarded in this judgment.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment does not identify the underlying pleaded claim heads. It records only that the claim was struck out for non-compliance with an order dated 7 November 2023 and because it had not been actively pursued.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.