Case 3313755/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Silva v Ritzy Mini Market Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3313755/2020
- Decision date
- 13 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Silva
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, in a judgment dated 17 January 2022 and sent to the parties on 13 February 2022, struck out Miss S Silva's claim against Ritzy Mini Market Limited. The tribunal recorded that, by letter dated 13 December 2021, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out.
The stated grounds were that the proceedings had been conducted by or on behalf of the claimant in a manner the tribunal described as scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious, and that the claim had not been actively pursued. The tribunal found that the claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing in response.
On that basis, the tribunal ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment does not record any merits determination, liability finding, or monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claims; it states only that 'the claim' was struck out after the claimant failed to respond adequately to the Tribunal's directions. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.