Case 3313761/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Lang & Others (Formerly Mr R Grappy & Others) v Abbott Datastore Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3313761/2019
- Decision date
- 30 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Lang & Others (Formerly Mr R Grappy & Others)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a video hearing in Watford on 12 April 2021, before Employment Judge R Lewis sitting alone, there was no participation for the claimants and the respondent was represented by counsel. The judgment was given by reference to the tribunal's Case Management Order of 16 July 2020, sent to the parties on 30 August 2020.
The tribunal dismissed the 'bottle' claims of all claimants because no claimant had sent evidence or submissions to support those claims. It also dismissed all other claims of all claimants in accordance with rule 37 because no claimant had sent evidence or submissions showing that any such claim had a reasonable prospect of success. The respondent made no application for costs.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Dismissed because no claimant sent evidence or submissions to support the claim; the written reasons do not identify the underlying legal label. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Dismissed under rule 37 because no claimant sent evidence or submissions to show any reasonable prospect of success; the written reasons do not identify the underlying legal label. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.