Case 3313762/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr S Irving, Solicitor — 2024
- Case reference
- 3313762/2022
- Decision date
- 26 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge French
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Ms S Wellings, Ms K Turquoise
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place at Watford Employment Tribunal over 25 to 26 June 2024 before Employment Judge French, with Ms S Wellings and Ms K Turquoise sitting as members. The respondent was represented by Mr S Irving, Solicitor, and the claimant appeared in person.
The tribunal held that the complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded and found that the claimant had been unfairly dismissed. It also dismissed the claimant's complaint of direct age discrimination.
The tribunal dismissed the complaint of indirect age discrimination as well. A further hearing was listed to determine remedy on 6 August 2024, so no final monetary award is recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Age discrimination | Direct age discrimination claim dismissed. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Age discrimination | Indirect age discrimination claim dismissed. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.