Case 3313766/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Carter v Metartec Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3313766/2023
- Decision date
- 25 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Modupe Smith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Carter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Watford by CVP on 25 November 2024 before Employment Judge Modupe Smith sitting alone. The only claim identified in the judgment was for unlawful deduction from wages brought by Mr S Carter against Metartec Limited.
The tribunal dismissed the claim. It found that the respondent did not unlawfully deduct any sums from the claimant's pay. The written record states that Mr Carter was unable to particularise any loss arising out of a deduction of wages in either his ET1 or his evidence, and that the tribunal therefore had no evidential basis on which the claim could succeed.
No financial award was made. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note at the end of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent did not unlawfully deduct any sums from the claimant's pay. It recorded that Mr Carter was unable to particularise any loss arising from a deduction of wages in either his ET1 or his evidence, so there was no evidential basis on which the claim could succeed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.