Case 3313773/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Kirandeep Sahota v B&M Retail Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3313773/2022
- Decision date
- 11 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Young
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Kirandeep Sahota
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal considered the Claimant's claim of unfair dismissal. Employment Judge Young sat alone at Watford Employment Tribunal by CVP, with the Claimant unrepresented and the Respondent represented by counsel.
The Tribunal found that the unfair dismissal claim had been presented outside the time limit contained in Section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It also found that it was reasonably practicable for the Claimant to have presented the claim in time. On that basis, the Tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claim and dismissed it.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed because it was presented outside the time limit in Section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and the Tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.