Case 3313783/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person / assisted by Hayley Moore (the claimant’s wife) For the v Respondent — 2025
- Case reference
- 3313783/2023
- Decision date
- 12 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr.
- Panel members
- Mr G. Page, Mr S. Holford
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person / assisted by Hayley Moore (the claimant’s wife) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal, sitting at Bury St. Edmunds in September 2025 before Employment Judge Mr A Spencer with non-legal members Mr G. Page and Mr S. Holford, gave a unanimous judgment in the claim brought by Mr L. Moore against Greene King Retail Services Limited. The complaint of disability discrimination by way of failure to make reasonable adjustments was found to be well-founded and succeeded.
On remedy for the disability discrimination claim, the respondent was ordered to pay compensation for past financial losses of £9,577.04 together with interest of £692.70, compensation for injury to feelings of £12,000 together with interest of £1,735.89, and nil for future financial losses. Interest on each head was calculated under the Employment Tribunals (Interest on Awards in Discrimination Cases) Regulations 1996.
The complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages and of holiday pay were each found not to be well-founded and were dismissed. Written reasons were not provided with the judgment; the decision records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would follow only if requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability is well-founded and succeeds. Remedy comprises past financial losses (£9,577.04), interest on past losses (£692.70), injury to feelings (£12,000), interest on injury to feelings (£1,735.89); future financial losses recorded as nil. | Upheld | Disability | £24,006 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages is not well-founded and is dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Complaint in respect of holiday pay is not well-founded and is dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £24,006
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £9,577
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals (Interest on Awards in Discrimination Cases) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.