Case 3313789/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Sophie Wakely v 2 Be Beautiful Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3313789/2020
- Decision date
- 15 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Sophie Wakely
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely by Employment Judge Tobin sitting alone on 15 September 2021. The judgment records that the claimant, Miss Sophie Wakely, and the respondent, 2 Be Beautiful Limited, agreed that the claimant was owed outstanding wages under s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal therefore ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £664.99, which was the agreed amount of the outstanding wages. The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
No discrimination, dismissal, or other substantive claims are recorded in the judgment text provided. The only adjudicated issue reflected in the decision is the agreed unlawful deduction from wages / outstanding wages claim, and the monetary award was confined to the agreed sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The parties agreed that the claimant was owed outstanding wages under s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996 and agreed the amount outstanding. | Upheld | — | £665 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £665
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.