Case 3313797/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Allsworth v Wesley Barrell Interiors Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2019
- Case reference
- 3313797/2019
- Decision date
- 21 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Allsworth
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Respondent did not present a response, and judgment was entered for the Claimant under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. On the wages claim, the tribunal found that Mrs C Allsworth was owed unpaid wages and awarded her £2,478.00 in compensation, which the Respondent was ordered to pay.
The tribunal also found that the Claimant was unfairly dismissed. Because the unfair dismissal remedy had not yet been assessed, the hearing listed for 29 January 2020 was converted to a hearing to determine what compensation or other remedy should be awarded for that claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the Claimant was owed unpaid wages and awarded £2,478.00 in compensation. | Upheld | — | £2,478 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found that the Claimant was unfairly dismissed. The listed hearing on 29 January 2020 was converted to a hearing to assess what compensation or other remedy should be awarded for unfair dismissal. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,478
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.