Case 3313799/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Dhaliwal v Royal Mail Group Limited and 4 others — 2023
- Case reference
- 3313799/2022
- Decision date
- 28 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Knowles Representation
Parties
6 namedClaimant
Mrs N Dhaliwal
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis reserved judgment concerned only the preliminary issue of disability in a claim that included race discrimination and disability discrimination. The claimant relied on anxiety and depression as the relevant impairment. The tribunal found that she had a mental impairment of anxiety and depression from July 2021, when she was diagnosed and prescribed sertraline, but it was not able to find that the impairment began much before that diagnosis.
For the period from July 2021 to February 2022, the tribunal found insufficient evidence that anxiety and depression had a substantial adverse effect on the claimant's ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities, or that such an effect would likely have occurred without sertraline. It also found that, although there may have been some adverse effects on concentration and motivation from February 2022 to 11 April 2022, the claimant had not proved that those effects were more than minor or trivial.
The tribunal found that from 12 April 2022 there was a deterioration in the claimant's mental health and that anxiety and depression were at least one reason why she was unable to attend work and a proposed meeting. It found a more than trivial impact on day-to-day activities, including attending work, working a full shift and interacting with colleagues and managers. However, the substantial adverse effects had not lasted 12 months by 27 November 2022. The tribunal concluded that by 25 October 2022, given the fit note, continuing absence, ongoing and increasing medication, and the GP's reference to preventing further worsening anxiety and more time off work, those effects were likely to last 12 months. The claimant was therefore a disabled person from 25 October 2022, but not before.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal decided only the preliminary issue of whether the claimant was a disabled person for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010. It found she was disabled due to anxiety and depression from 25 October 2022, but not before that date. The merits of the disability discrimination complaints were not determined in this judgment. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
17 references- Section 6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010
- Section 212 Equality Act 2010
- deduced effect
- Abadeh v British Telecommunications plc
- J v DLA Piper UK LLP
- Khorochilova v Euro Rep Ltd
- Igweike v TSB Bank plc
- Herry v Dudley Metropolitan Council
- Goodwin v The Patent Office
- Paterson v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis
- Rayner v Turning Point
- Woodrup v London Borough of Southwark
- Fathers v Pets at Home Ltd
- SCA Packaging Ltd v Boyle
- All Answers Ltd v Mr W and Ms R
- McDougall v Richmond Adult College
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.