Case 3313811/2022 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 3313811/2022
- Decision date
- 30 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Coll
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
1 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Watford on 12 June 2024, Employment Judge Coll held that the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear the claimant's disability discrimination claims under the Equality Act 2010 in relation to the matters identified in the CMO promulgated on 25 July 2023. The tribunal found that those claims were presented outside the statutory time limits and that it was not just and equitable to extend time, so they were dismissed.
The judgment records three matters within that dismissal: a failure to promote the claimant to band 6 in the period 2015 to December 2016, an instruction not to work the nightshift in November 2021, and an allegation of bullying involving a threat to escort the claimant from the prison estate if she did not complete an ACCT form in or about July 2021. The judgment also states that the claimant's application to amend the case to include two Equality Act 2010 claims relating to Dragon voice activated software succeeded. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Failure to promote the claimant to a band 6 in the period 2015 to December 2016; dismissed because the claim was presented outside the statutory time limits and it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Instruction not to work the nightshift in November 2021; dismissed because the claim was presented outside the statutory time limits and it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Bullying allegation concerning a threat to escort the claimant from the prison estate if she did not complete an ACCT form in or about July 2021; dismissed because the claim was presented outside the statutory time limits and it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- statutory time limits
- just and equitable extension
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.