Case 3313819/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Johns v FCDO Services — 2025
- Case reference
- 3313819/2022
- Decision date
- 18 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Margo
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Johns
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal struck out the claim in case numbers 3313819/2022 and 3302888/2024. The judgment records that Mr D Johns failed to attend a Preliminary Hearing on 15 November 2024 and then failed to comply with the case management order requiring him to write by 25 November 2024 explaining his non-attendance.
A strike out warning was issued on 24 January 2025 on the basis that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant was directed to write to the Tribunal by 7 February 2025 with reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing to give those reasons, but he did not respond. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim on the ground that it had not been actively pursued, and the Final Hearing listed for September 2025 will not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment does not set out the substantive allegations. The disability discrimination classification follows the case listing and supplied case context. The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.