Case 3313829/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Ms Evans-Jarvis (S) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3313829/2020
- Decision date
- 12 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Talbot-Ponsonby Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Reading heard the case on 7-8 April 2020 before Employment Judge Talbot-Ponsonby. The claimant, Louise Acors, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms Evans-Jarvis (S). The written judgment records that the claimant's claim against Oemeta (UK) Limited was not well founded and was dismissed.
The decision states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing. It also records that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by either party within 14 days of the written decision being sent on 22 April 2022. No monetary award is recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states only that the claimant's claim was 'not well founded' and dismissed; no further reasons are set out in the written record because reasons were given orally at the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.