Case 3313831/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Prost v Kingston Smith and Partners LLP and 2 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 3313831/2019
- Decision date
- 24 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lang
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr E Prost
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 5 March 2020 before Employment Judge Lang sitting alone in Reading, the first respondent applied to strike out the claim against it and the second respondent also applied to strike out the claim against it. The tribunal granted both applications, striking out the claims on the basis that they had no reasonable prospects of success.
On the claimant's application, Quadriga Worldwide Limited (in administration) was added as a respondent in the proceedings. The written record does not set out the underlying factual or legal basis of the substantive claims, and it records no merits findings or monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written record does not identify the substantive cause of action. The claim against the first respondent was struck out on the ground that it had no reasonable prospects of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | The written record does not identify the substantive cause of action. The claim against the second respondent was struck out on the ground that it had no reasonable prospects of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.