Case 3313833/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K A-Kum v Next Music — 2023
- Case reference
- 3313833/2022
- Decision date
- 21 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K A-Kum
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt only with the unfair dismissal complaint. By letter dated 6 January 2023, it gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on the basis that, from the employment dates on the claim form, she did not appear to have the two years' continuous service needed to bring an unfair dismissal claim.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge R Lewis struck out the unfair dismissal complaint.
The judgment records that the claimant's remaining claim or claims continue. No remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | By letter dated 6 January 2023, the tribunal invited the claimant to make representations or request a hearing because, on the employment dates in the claim form, she did not appear to have two years' service. No sufficient representations were made, and the unfair dismissal complaint was struck out. The judgment states that the claimant's remaining claims continue. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.