Case 3313861/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Robert Debont v Marsh Farm Future - 1st Mr David Eugene Crean - 2nd Mr Mohammed Rafi - 3rd Mr Barry Patel- 4th — 2022
- Case reference
- 3313861/2021
- Decision date
- 28 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Robert Debont
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 23 August 2022, Employment Judge Bedeau sitting at Watford issued a dismissal judgment in case numbers 3313861/2021 and 3300245/2022. In 3300245/2022, the claims against the 2nd, 3rd and 4th respondents were dismissed on the basis of the claimant's withdrawal. The second respondent was also dismissed from all proceedings brought by the claimant in both case numbers.
The judgment records that the claims of breach of contract and unauthorised deductions from wages were also dismissed on the claimant's withdrawal. The extracted text contains no substantive liability findings and records no compensation or other monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal. The judgment also records dismissal of claims against the 2nd, 3rd and 4th respondents in case no. 3300245/2022. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal. The judgment does not record any monetary award. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.