Case 3313866/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Gasworks South East (April/Roger) — 2019
- Case reference
- 3313866/2019
- Decision date
- 27 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Appearances
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was determined at Norwich on 30 October 2019 before Employment Judge Postle. The respondent, Gasworks South East Limited, did not enter a response, and the judgment states that pursuant to Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 the claimant was entitled to the relief set out in the decision.
The tribunal ordered payment of accrued holiday pay in the sum of £451.58. It also found that the claimant had suffered an unlawful deduction from wages totalling £652.82 and ordered the respondent to pay that amount. No other claims, findings, or remedy components are recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The respondent did not enter a response. The tribunal, acting pursuant to Rule 21, ordered payment of accrued holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £452 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent did not enter a response. The tribunal, acting pursuant to Rule 21, found the claimant had suffered an unlawful deduction of wages and ordered payment of the stated sum. | Upheld | — | £653 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,104
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.