Mr K A AFRIFA ANTWI v IKEA Ltd — 2022

Case reference: 3313883/2021
Decision date: 26 July 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge R. Lewis Date

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr K A AFRIFA ANTWI

Respondent

IKEA Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal had written to the claimant on 14 June 2021 giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued.

The claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim, and the hearing listed for 17 and 18 October 2022 was vacated.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The gov.uk listing identified unfair dismissal. The judgment states only that 'the claim is struck out' because it had not been actively pursued, without separately addressing listed claim categories.	Struck out	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	The gov.uk listing identified unlawful deduction from wages. The judgment states only that 'the claim is struck out' because it had not been actively pursued, without separately addressing listed claim categories.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.