Case 3313927/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Hunter v London City Access — 2023
- Case reference
- 3313927/2021
- Decision date
- 3 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lewis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Hunter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short case management outcome rather than a merits decision. Employment Judge Lewis Date recorded that the claim was struck off because the respondent, London City Access, was dissolved on 13 June 2020.
No substantive findings were made on liability, remedy, or the facts of the underlying employment dispute. The judgment does not set out the pleaded allegations, and it does not record any award.
The case was sent to the parties on 3 February 2023 and entered in the register on that date.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim was struck off because the respondent was dissolved on 13 June 2020. The underlying claim type is not stated in the judgment text; this classification follows the case listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim was struck off because the respondent was dissolved on 13 June 2020. The underlying claim type is not stated in the judgment text; this classification follows the case listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.