Case 3313928/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Sealey v Lemon Grass (Findon) Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3313928/2019
- Decision date
- 20 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vowles Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Sealey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent, Lemon Grass (Findon) Limited, did not present a response to the claim. The tribunal therefore entered judgment for the claimant under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The hearing listed for 2 March 2020 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that Miss D Sealey was entitled to a redundancy payment of £958. It also found that she was entitled to notice pay of £849. The judgment records these as separate awards made in the claimant's favour.
The total award ordered by the tribunal was £1,807, comprising the redundancy payment and notice pay. No other remedy components are recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £958 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records this as 'Notice Pay'. It is mapped to breach_of_contract because the listing categories include breach of contract and the award was made as unpaid notice pay. | Upheld | — | £849 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,807
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.