Case 3313966/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Daniel v LC Electrical Contractors Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3313966/2020
- Decision date
- 25 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Daniels
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Daniel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Daniels sitting alone at Watford on 25 January 2022. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms D Crook. The judgment records that the parties expressly agreed settlement terms under which the respondent would pay the claimant £234 in gross unpaid holiday pay, subject to any deductions for tax or NI as required by law.
After those terms were agreed, the claimant withdrew the claims at the hearing. The tribunal therefore dismissed the claims upon withdrawal. No liability findings were made and no discrimination issue, legal test, or separate remedy calculation is set out in the judgment beyond the agreed £234 settlement sum for unpaid holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The parties expressly agreed settlement terms under which the respondent would pay the claimant £234 gross unpaid holiday pay, less any deductions for tax or NI as due by law, within 14 days. The claimant then withdrew the claims at the hearing, and they were dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | £234 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £234
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.