Case 3313970/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Haseeb v Crystals Property Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3313970/2021
- Decision date
- 8 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Haseeb
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued under Rule 21 and records that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. The tribunal ordered Crystals Property Ltd to pay the claimant the net sum of £2,016.00 for that deduction.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £210.00. The decision does not set out any further reasoning beyond these orders, and no additional remedies are recorded.
The judgment is dated 4 April 2022 and was sent to the parties and entered in the register on 8 April 2022 by Employment Judge R Lewis.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,016 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £210 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,226
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.