Case 3313972/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Crouchman v Hardall International — 2022
- Case reference
- 3313972/2021
- Decision date
- 13 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maxwell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Crouchman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 24 June 2022, the tribunal gave Mr C Crouchman an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out. The reasons identified were that he had not complied with the tribunal's direction dated 10 March 2022 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Mr Crouchman did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. Employment Judge Maxwell therefore ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment records no findings on the merits of the underlying heads of claim and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment only states that the claim was struck out; this head is taken from the case listing. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment only states that the claim was struck out; this head is taken from the case listing. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment only states that the claim was struck out; this head is taken from the case listing. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment only states that the claim was struck out; this head is taken from the case listing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.