Case 3313981/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Korn v London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 3313981/2021
- Decision date
- 25 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Korn
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Miss S Korn’s claims against London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust. The reasons given were that she had failed to pay the deposit order issued on 23 August 2022 and had not responded to the tribunal’s letters dated 26 September 2022 and 16 November 2022.
The tribunal also found that the claims had not been actively pursued. It referred to the claimant’s emails of 31 July 2022 and 24 October 2022 as showing that she was not actively pursuing the claims or intending to do so. The claimant did not make written representations, or sufficient written representations, explaining why the claims should not be struck out, and did not request a hearing.
As a result, the tribunal ordered that the claims be struck out and recorded that the hearing listed for 28 to 30 November 2022 would not take place. The judgment was sent to the parties on 25 November 2022.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment strikes out the claims generally; the age discrimination category is taken from the GOV.UK case listing for this decision. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment strikes out the claims generally; the breach of contract category is taken from the GOV.UK case listing for this decision. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.