Case 3314009/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Szoda v HR Projects South East Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3314009/2019
- Decision date
- 5 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vowles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Szoda
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a response, so judgment was entered for the claimant under Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The tribunal recorded that the claimant was owed wages and expenses and awarded her £4,823.91 in compensation, payable by the respondent.
The separate redundancy payment claim failed. The tribunal found that the claimant had been employed for less than two years and was therefore not entitled to a redundancy payment. The hearing listed for 5 March 2020 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to 'unpaid wages and expenses' and awards £4,823.91 in compensation. It does not separate wages from expenses or identify a statutory basis beyond the listing category, so this is classified as an unlawful deduction from wages claim. | Upheld | — | £4,824 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant had been employed for less than 2 years and was not entitled to a redundancy payment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,824
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.