Case 3314012/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Neshava v Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust — 2023
- Case reference
- 3314012/2021
- Decision date
- 25 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a Reading CVP hearing on 11 July 2023, Employment Judge Anstis sitting alone heard the matter between Mr V Neshava and Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust. The written judgment records that the claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The tribunal struck out all claims other than claims of constructive unfair dismissal, failure to make reasonable adjustments, indirect disability discrimination and victimisation. The judgment does not set out the particulars of the struck-out claims, and it does not determine the merits of the four listed claims.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No monetary award or other remedy is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment struck out all claims other than claims of constructive unfair dismissal, failure to make reasonable adjustments, indirect disability discrimination and victimisation. The written record does not identify the struck-out claims individually. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.