Case 3314029/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss B Kelly v Best 4 Beauty UK Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3314029/2019
- Decision date
- 3 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss B Kelly
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment made because the time limit for presenting a response had expired on 12 June 2019 and no response had been presented. On the available material, Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto decided that a determination could properly be made without a hearing.
The tribunal found that Best 4 Beauty UK Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Miss B Kelly’s wages and ordered the respondent to pay £687.46. It also found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant in lieu of entitlement to annual leave and ordered payment of £408 for that claim.
The judgment records that the hearing listed for 20 November 2019 would not take place. No separate award breakdown beyond the two sums ordered was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £687 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant in lieu of entitlement to annual leave. | Upheld | — | £408 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,095
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.