Claimant v CGI IT UK Ltd — 2023

Case reference: 3314122/2020
Decision date: 22 March 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Tuck KC
Venue: Watford

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Respondent

CGI IT UK Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The case was heard at Watford Employment Tribunal via CVP on 22 March 2023 before Employment Judge Tuck KC. The claimant was Philip Kallay (deceased), represented by a family member and lay representative, and the respondent was CGI IT UK Ltd.

The only substantive disposal recorded in the written judgment is that the unlawful deduction from wages claim was struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. The written record does not set out the tribunal's oral reasons beyond that disposition.

The judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No monetary award is recorded.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	The written judgment states that the claim was struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. The note records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons will be provided unless requested.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.