Case 3314123/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v M Hospitality International Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3314123/2020
- Decision date
- 14 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wyeth Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningWith no response submitted by the respondent, the tribunal held that the claimant's complaints of unauthorised deduction of wages under Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996, including unpaid holiday, and breach of contract were well founded. It calculated the claimant's gross weekly wage at £506.58, being 80% of his normal average contractual pay because he had agreed to furlough for the period in question.
The tribunal found that the claimant had not been paid from 17 March 2020 to 8 August 2020, a period of 20 weeks and 4 working days, and awarded £10,421.07 for that unpaid period. Because he had taken no holidays during that time, it also awarded £626.69 for 2 weeks and 1 day of untaken holiday, and £506.58 for one week's notice after finding he had been dismissed without notice. It recorded that the claimant had been informed of dismissal and issued with a P45 showing 30 April 2020 as his last day of employment, but the total payable was calculated by reference to the later termination date of 8 August 2020.
The tribunal said it had no jurisdiction to consider the unfair dismissal complaint because the claimant did not have sufficient qualifying service and no exception applied. It also recorded that the claimant was not pursuing any complaint of race discrimination. The total amount payable by the respondent was £11,554.34.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award covered unpaid wages of £10,421.07 for 17 March 2020 to 8 August 2020 and £626.69 for untaken holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £11,048 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed without notice and awarded one week's notice pay. | Upheld | — | £507 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal said it had no jurisdiction to consider this complaint because the claimant did not have sufficient qualifying service and no exception applied. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,554
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.