Case 3314139/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Ferber, Counsel For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 3314139/2020
- Decision date
- 23 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Appearances
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms Ferber, Counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing to decide whether the claimant's depression and anxiety amounted to a disability within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 during the period May 2017 to July 2020. The tribunal considered the claimant's evidence, GP notes, occupational health reports from October 2019 and July 2020, and a therapist's report dated 20 February 2020. The law was common ground and the burden of proving disability rested on the claimant.
The tribunal found no medical evidence of a mental health impairment between May 2017 and 22 February 2018. It noted that the GP notes first recorded depressive mood on 22 February 2018, when medication was prescribed and then altered because the first medication was not helping. The claimant's account that the effects began in October 2016, and that medication was increased from October 2017, was not supported by the contemporaneous medical records.
On the evidence available, the tribunal concluded that the claimant had a mental impairment from February 2018 at the latest and that it had a substantial and long-term adverse effect on her normal day-to-day activities from that point. It therefore held that the claimant satisfied the definition of disability under section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 from 22 February 2018. The judgment did not determine the substantive liability issues or any remedy, and it recorded that some list-of-issues paragraphs were withdrawn and dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary hearing judgment only. The tribunal found that the claimant had a disability within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 from 22 February 2018, but it did not determine the substantive discrimination claims or any remedy. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Section 6 of the Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.