Case 3314152/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Holmes v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 3314152/2019
- Decision date
- 6 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JUDGMENT
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr R Holmes
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented. On the material before Employment Judge M Warren, the tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £311.80 gross.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £838.66. The judgment states that the total payable under the terms of the judgment, without deduction and taxable in the hands of the claimant, was £1,150.46.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £311.80. | Upheld | — | £312 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £838.66. | Upheld | — | £839 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,150
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.